Could AI execute meaningful parts of the task?
Digital feasibility, repeatability, information intensity, rule structure, human-context dependency, and physical-world dependency shape this axis.

MYTOPMATCH CAREER TOOLS · DISCOVER YOUR OPTIONS
FREE TASK-LEVEL CALCULATOR
WHAT IS AI JOB EXPOSURE?
AI job exposure describes how the tasks inside work may interact with current AI capabilities. Some tasks may be technically amenable to automation. Others may become faster, broader, or better supported while a person continues to make decisions, verify outputs, build trust, act in the physical world, or remain accountable.
That is why MyTopMatch does not collapse everything into a single “replacement risk.” It reports AI Automation Exposure and AI Leverage Potential separately, then displays human-responsibility safeguards alongside them.
The International Labour Organization also uses task-level exposure framing in its current global research. MyTopMatch links to that research for context but does not reproduce the ILO index or apply its occupational dataset in this calculation.
AUTOMATION VS. AUGMENTATION
Digital feasibility, repeatability, information intensity, rule structure, human-context dependency, and physical-world dependency shape this axis.
Assistability, potential time leverage, verification feasibility, and workflow readiness shape this separate axis.
Judgment, relationships, accountability, physical context, regulation, and originality inform safeguards—not immunity claims.
HOW THE AI CAREER EXPOSURE CALCULATOR WORKS
Describe at least five material tasks covering at least 70% of a typical work period.
Each task receives six automation-factor ratings and four augmentation-factor ratings.
Task scores are multiplied by work-time share. Non-100% totals normalize only after explicit confirmation.
Automation and leverage receive separate scores, bands, task contributors, safeguards, and recommendations.
FICTIONAL WORKED EXAMPLE
BUILD AI CAREER RESILIENCE
Track what actually fills your week so exposure is not inferred from a broad occupational label.
Start with reversible, low-consequence uses where inputs, outputs, and acceptance criteria are clear.
Strengthen source checking, exception handling, error detection, and judgment about when not to use AI.
Connect AI-assisted production to stakeholder context, decisions, adoption, and measurable outcomes.
Use review gates, audit trails, privacy controls, and named responsibility where consequences are significant.
Document the workflow, human contribution, safeguard, and outcome so AI-enabled capability is credible rather than generic.
DATA AND FUTURE OCCUPATION SUPPORT
The result schema records the user-entered occupation label, mapping status, method version, task coverage, and any future dataset versions. That makes a later occupational adapter possible without changing historical results.
Occupation-specific editorial pages should launch only when MyTopMatch has a documented taxonomy mapping, dated task source, substantive expert-reviewed explanation, and enough unique evidence to answer a real search intent. This release creates no mass occupation pages.
PRIVATE TASK DATA
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
No. Exposure describes how task characteristics may interact with current AI capabilities. It is not a probability of unemployment, displacement, wage change, employer action, or occupational disappearance.
Automation Exposure concerns technical amenability to AI-mediated execution. AI Leverage Potential concerns useful assistance while a human retains verification and responsibility. A task can be high on both axes.
People with the same title can spend their time very differently. Task-time weighting makes the calculation reflect the work you describe rather than an unsupported assumption about everyone in an occupation.
The calculator requires at least 70% task coverage. If shares do not total exactly 100%, it proportionally normalizes them only after you explicitly confirm that choice.
Not in this release. Role and occupation labels are user-entered context and are not mapped to an external taxonomy. The result clearly records that no external dataset was used.
Judgment, relationships, accountability, physical context, regulation, and originality shape how AI-supported work should be designed and verified. They are not treated as proof that work is immune from change.
The current method is AICX-3.0.0, dated 2026-08-22. Because AI capabilities change rapidly, material capability changes require a new method version rather than a silent reinterpretation of old results.
No. The explanatory page and methodology are public. Task names, ratings, scores, saved analysis, and Career Agent comparisons are private and access-controlled.
METHOD, SOURCE & CITATION NOTES